测评: Linode 1GB内存 KVM VPS 日本东京2 简单测评(转)

测评: Linode 1GB内存 KVM VPS 日本东京2 简单测评(转)

文章来源：https://zhujiwiki.com/10416.html

Linode官网地址：https://www.linode.com/

看友博已经评测了，直接拿来转发了，写个好累的说，呵呵。以下面的套餐为例。

Linode 1GB
内存：1G
硬盘：20G SSD
CPU：1核
流量：1T/月
端口：1000M（out）
优惠码：PodcastInIt2017（使用本优惠码送20美元）
价格：5美元/月
购买链接

1、系统信息及带宽测试

CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v4 @ 2.30GHz
Number of cores      : 1
CPU frequency        : 2299.994 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 20.0 GB (0.8 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 989 MB (575 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 511 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days, 0 hour 45 min
Load average         : 0.31, 0.20, 0.08
OS                   : CentOS 6.8
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 4.8.6-x86_64-linode78
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run)   : 659 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run)   : 781 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run)   : 788 MB/s
Average I/O speed    : 742.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
CacheFly                        204.93.150.152          5.29MB/s      
Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          73.7MB/s      
Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            23.8MB/s      
Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           7.03MB/s      
Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           8.23MB/s      
Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             17.9MB/s      
Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           12.5MB/s      
Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          19.9MB/s      
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            3.43MB/s      
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           25.0MB/s      
Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          35.8MB/s      
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv6 address            Download Speed
Linode, Atlanta, GA             2600:3c02::4b           3.84MB/s      
Linode, Dallas, TX              2600:3c00::4b           13.7MB/s      
Linode, Newark, NJ              2600:3c03::4b           11.4MB/s      
Linode, Singapore, SG           2400:8901::4b           7.71MB/s      
Linode, Tokyo, JP               2400:8900::4b           77.5MB/s      
Softlayer, San Jose, CA         2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4    8.61MB/s      
Softlayer, Washington, WA       2607:f0d0:3001:78::2    4.40MB/s      
Softlayer, Paris, FR            2a03:8180:1301:8::4     7.37MB/s      
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        2401:c900:1101:8::2     22.8MB/s      
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP            2401:c900:1001:16::4    201MB/s 

2、上传/下载带宽测试

Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by at2wn (Yokohama) [24.99 km]: 115.053 ms
Testing download speed...............................................
Download: 426.63 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed.................................................
Upload: 226.73 Mbit/s

3、国内访问速度

4、测试硬盘 I/O 性能

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 2.70453 s, 99.3 MB/s

5、UnixBench跑分

Benchmark Run: Wed Feb 15 2017 01:55:07 - 02:23:13
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       27110732.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3271.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5700.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        993071.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          272347.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2773598.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1754931.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 330300.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              16502.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   5550.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    727.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1976183.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   27110732.5   2323.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3271.2    594.8
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5700.9   1325.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     993071.9   2507.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     272347.4   1645.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2773598.7   4782.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1754931.9   1410.7
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     330300.0    825.8
Process Creation                                126.0      16502.0   1309.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       5550.6   1309.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        727.1   1211.9
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1976183.2   1317.5
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1485.3

6、丢包测试

Ping from 192.168.1.186 to 139.162.xxx.xxx
==============================================================================
02/15 09:54:40.403         Ping to 139.162.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
02/15 09:54:40.527 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=119ms TTL=50, ave=119.00ms
02/15 09:54:41.506 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=106ms TTL=50, ave=112.50ms
02/15 09:54:42.529 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=123ms TTL=50, ave=116.00ms

02/15 09:54:44.530 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=126ms TTL=50, ave=118.60ms
02/15 09:54:45.534 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=129ms TTL=50, ave=120.33ms

02/15 09:54:49.535 PingMax #10 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=131ms TTL=50, ave=121.80ms

02/15 09:54:52.501 PingMin #13 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=100ms TTL=50, ave=119.69ms

02/15 09:54:54.492 PingMin #15 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=90ms TTL=50, ave=116.60ms

02/15 09:54:58.498 PingMin #19 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=84ms TTL=50, ave=111.47ms

02/15 09:54:59.484         === 20 有效发送,   20 接收,     0.00% 丢失, 110.25ms 平均值  ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间:  2017/02/15 09:54:40
经过时间:            000:00:19
结束时间:  2017/02/15 09:54:59
----------------
    20 总计发送  
    0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)                
----------------
    20 有效发送  
    20 有效接收      
    0 timed out (0.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值  84ms, 最大值  131ms, 平均值  110.25ms

7、路由追踪